USC 1983 lawsuit filed for deprivation of rights
|
mtnlife77
|
Posted 12:55 pm, 05/10/2019
|
 I think "Dump" is somehow tied in with law enforcement!! 
|
|
jack rip her
|
Posted 1:47 pm, 04/30/2019
|
Good examples are federal justices with leftist views that have constantly gone against Trump decisions later to be overturned by what the law actually allows.
|
|
jrscott295
|
Posted 1:05 pm, 04/30/2019
|
No where in the US Constitution does it ever say the Supreme Court has final say in what is Constitutional, in fact none of the Federal Branches are given that power. Ultimately then by the Bill of Rights it belongs to the States (who gave the Federal government certain rights) and the People.
I agree with the interpretation that certain parts of the Constitution have been to broadly interpreted particularly in the later 20th and early 21st centuries to pretty much justify the Federal government doing anything it wants, and that was never the intention of the Founding Fathers.
|
|
aFicIoNadoS
|
Posted 4:13 pm, 04/29/2019
|
Lumpy is a jailhouse lawyer lawyer
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 2:53 pm, 04/29/2019
|
JACK-OFF, I DON'T NEED ONE.
|
|
jack rip her
|
Posted 2:38 pm, 04/29/2019
|
Dumpy you will need to get a good old educated wilkes county hayseed to explain Fairplay's post.
|
|
Fairplay
|
Posted 11:58 am, 04/29/2019
|
From a Bar Association panel discussion on Federal vs States Rights to govern the sale of drugs, narcotics, and hallucinogenic materials.
Until the early 20 th century, states traditionally enjoyed exclusive police powers independent of federal authority, to protect the “health, welfare, safety and morals” of their citizens. With the advent of the New Deal in the 1930s came case law interpreting the Commerce Clause to give Congress powers to regulate intrastate affairs that “affected” interstate commerce and by the 1960s, cases coming out of the civil rights struggle gave Congress the right to regulate social policy in the states. Federal commerce power is now so expansive that the individual states seem to have no discretion left to exercise their traditional police powers. The Rehnquist Court has revived the “states’ rights” principle under the Tenth Amendment to a limited degree and in selected cases, but only marginally dampening federal commerce power. The federal Controlled Substances Act is grounded in federal commerce power and states explicitly that any state law that is in “positive conflict” with the Act is preempted by federal law. The Act includes the statement from Congress that drug abuse is a “national” problem requiring federal control. In 2005 the decision in a California medical marijuana case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, where two patients permitted under state law to use marijuana either grow their own or are given free supplies, which constitutes entirely non-commercial, intrastate activity, may push federal commerce power to its furthest limit yet.
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 7:03 am, 04/29/2019
|
NOT MY INTERPRETATION, IT WAS THE SUPREME COURTS.
|
|
onlyinashe
|
Posted 6:58 am, 04/29/2019
|
So your interpretation is the regulation of commerce clause of Article 8 grants the government the power to regulate drugs and medications?
|
|
jack rip her
|
Posted 6:51 am, 04/29/2019
|
Well look who the dogs drug up the mountain,
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 6:11 am, 04/29/2019
|
YES YOU DID.
ARTICLE I SECTION 8 CLAUSE 3.
YOU'RE WELCOME.
|
|
Joseph T.
|
Posted 1:01 pm, 04/28/2019
|
I must have miss the part in article 1 section 8 of the US Constitution that gives the Gov. the power to regulate drugs.
|
|
billythemountain
|
Posted 5:05 pm, 04/24/2019
|
OP, you could at least copy/paste the initial case summary rather than have us subscribe to Pacer to read a sure to be tossed out frivolous lawsuit.
|
|
aFicIoNadoS
|
Posted 4:09 pm, 04/24/2019
|
It’s not been reported because it’s and he has no case
|
|
jack rip her
|
Posted 2:44 pm, 04/24/2019
|
ONe in the same billy bob. I thought he had already filed something a while back.
|
|
billythemountain
|
Posted 12:52 pm, 04/24/2019
|
Isn’t that the lunatic with the DMT lab? Haha.
|
|
drf3rd
|
Posted 12:43 pm, 04/24/2019
|
In case the newspaper hasn't reported on it yet, another civil action has been filed against ACSO for deprivation of rights:
|
|
|
