A message to Rose, Roark, and Perry
|
Educate Yourself
|
Posted 9:41 am, 10/27/2017
|
This is ridiculous, and I'm done trying to convince you of the validity of public documents (obituaries and eulogies). As I said before, just prove that Terry and Richard even knew of each other and I'll be satisfied. Aficionados made a claim that they were related and I'd like a single piece of evidence that they have ever interacted.
You trying to fight his battles for him makes you one of his boot-lickers, since you were asking for clarification.
|
|
jack rip her
|
Posted 9:37 am, 10/27/2017
|
ashehikingmom (view profile) Posted 9:14 am, 10/27/2017 From experience the site you are using is not completely trustworthy. While looking for my family using that site. My grandmother wasn’t listed as a child of my great grandparents. My great aunt was listed as the mother of a couple of my dad’s siblings. It said my great grandmother had been married once before. That wasn’t true and has been proven.
|
|
jack rip her
|
Posted 9:35 am, 10/27/2017
|
Special ed, read ashehikemoms post on the other thread about the site you are using. Then tell me where you are getting that I am a star eyed follower of Fins. Tell me what that statement refers to.
|
|
Educate Yourself
|
Posted 9:33 am, 10/27/2017
|
Plus, it doesn't even matter. None of the stuff I posted about Richard not being his uncle matters. I asked you to prove that they even knew each other, and you're busy refuting (clearly true) information about a claim that I released you from having to prove. Just prove that they knew each other at all and I'll let it go.
|
|
Educate Yourself
|
Posted 9:30 am, 10/27/2017
|
Ok, it's clear to anyone that isn't one of your starry-eyed followers that you're making poor excuses and ridiculous assertions about my proof that you're wrong, but regardless of what you think of public documents' validity, I still provided items to back up my statement. You have provided nothing.
|
|
aFicIoNadoS
|
Posted 9:28 am, 10/27/2017
|
YOu posted an unvalidated website showing a very small list of relatives. That neither proves or disproves anything. I will take the word of people I’ve talked to that know or knew both individuals
|
|
Educate Yourself
|
Posted 8:58 am, 10/27/2017
|
Post proof Aficionados, you and sassy asked the same of me and I did.
|
|
Educate Yourself
|
Posted 8:57 am, 10/27/2017
|
I am on your side, I am trying to fight this ridiculous nonsense you all keep trying to pass off as fact. There is plenty of truth here to fight corruption with, we do not need to sink to this level. The fact that you think someone refusing to allow an obvious lie to go unquestioned means that they are automatically against you is telling.
|
|
jack rip her
|
Posted 8:41 am, 10/27/2017
|
special ed, give it up. You made a new name only to come on here and try and turn the conversation away from the overwhelming evidence against Terry and several others. Unless you have proof beyond a shadow of a doubt just shut up.
|
|
aFicIoNadoS
|
Posted 8:38 am, 10/27/2017
|
I had nothing to cover up. My research is from personal contacts, not an amateur historian site. You’re welcome to go to Avery and talk to the same people.
|
|
Educate Yourself
|
Posted 8:33 am, 10/27/2017
|
You're absolutely right, Aficionados. Did you care to prove your claim that Richard Buchanan and Terry Buchanan are related to each other? After your sad attempts to cover up exactly what you meant last night, I'll even accept any proof that they even knew each other, much less that they were related. Or are you one of the liars that will not be tolerated?
|
|
168amax
|
Posted 12:56 am, 10/27/2017
|
Was his bond a secured one or unsecured? Unsecured is not worth the paper its printed on,
|
|
jrscott295
|
Posted 12:26 am, 10/27/2017
|
In addition to Rose, Roark and Sands the Sheriff is up for election to.
I don't think Perry or Rhodes are up for election this time. But I could be wrong.
|
|
sassy62
|
Posted 9:45 pm, 10/26/2017
|
What is that old saying......no tolerance for thieves and rogues......seems to fit.
|
|
whocaresaboutit
|
Posted 9:31 pm, 10/26/2017
|
With Roark being an incumbent will his term be 2 or 4 years?
Why on earth did people vote for this manipulator last year anyway?
It seems to me that people in the county were so caught up in the presidential election that they just automatically voted republican regardless and now regret voting for Roark.
|
|
aFicIoNadoS
|
Posted 9:16 pm, 10/26/2017
|
Your crooked lying sheriff is done. Your crooked lying commissioners are next. Then we get your crooked county manager. Times are changing. Liars and thieves will not be tolerated.
Note from GoNC: a portion of this post was removed for trolling.
|
|
Tabs
|
Posted 8:34 pm, 10/26/2017
|
NSA Troll, I believe Roark, Rose and Sands will be up for re-election in 2018.
|
|
NSA Troll
|
Posted 11:24 am, 10/26/2017
|
Barring early removal or resignation, how many of these will be up for re-election this time.?
|
|
jrscott295
|
Posted 6:55 am, 10/26/2017
|
I've read the whole 32 pages, if Buchanan is the only one to go down I'll be surprised.
|
|
|
